AutoTweet + Make (formerly Integromat)
Visual automation with AutoTweet as a module in your scenarios.
Category · Automation
What you can do
Multi-step content pipelines
Trigger (e.g., RSS) → filter → enrich → AutoTweet generate → review channel → schedule. Make's visual editor handles complex flows Zapier struggles with.
Conditional routing
Make's router module sends different content types to different X accounts (e.g., long-form to founder account, links to brand account).
Error handling + retries
Make has first-class retry + alert logic. If AutoTweet's API returns a transient error, Make retries automatically and pings Slack if it persists.
Cheaper than Zapier at scale
Make's pricing scales much better than Zapier for high-volume automation ($9/mo for 10,000 ops vs. Zapier $19.99 for 750 tasks).
Setup
On launch, Make's AutoTweet module will offer: triggers (post published, post failed), actions (generate tweet, schedule post, get analytics), and search (find post by criteria). Standard Make scenario builder.
Common questions
When will the Make integration ship?+
Q3 2026, paired with the Zapier integration. Both follow the same API surface so the integrations launch together. Join the waitlist to be notified.
Make vs. Zapier — which should I pick?+
Make wins for high-volume, complex automation (visual flows, routers, cheaper per-op pricing). Zapier wins for simple linear automation with a wider app library. For most X content workflows, either works. For >5,000 ops/month, Make is the cheaper choice.
Can I use Make with AutoTweet today (before the native module ships)?+
Yes via Make's HTTP module — point it at AutoTweet's webhook ingestion endpoint. Slightly more setup than the planned native module but functional today.
Is the integration limited to Make's free tier?+
No, all Make tiers work. Make Free covers 1,000 ops/month (≈ 500 tweets). Make Core ($9/mo) covers 10,000 ops. Make Pro ($16/mo) covers 10,000 with advanced features. AutoTweet doesn't charge extra for the integration.